Pakistan, India launch probes after blasts in Islamabad, New Delhi

Bomb blasts occurred in the capitals of India and Pakistan on consecutive days, Killing 13 people in New Delhi and 12 in Islamabad, prompting investigations.

In India, authorities quickly invoked an 'anti-terror' law following the Delhi Red Fort blast, which resulted in at least 12 fatalities, highlighting the severity of the attack and the government's response to terrorism threats. Both countries launched formal probes into the incidents, reflecting escalating tensions and a mutual blame game amid the investigations. The coverage underscores ongoing geopolitical tensions between India and Pakistan, especially surrounding conflicts in Kashmir, with references to broader regional issues such as military standoffs and ceasefire stability. The incident in India has spurred heightened security measures and increased scrutiny on potential terrorist activities, with the event becoming a focal point for media and government scrutiny. Coverage by Al Jazeera emphasizes impartial reporting, offering live updates, analyses, and historical context regarding India-Pakistan tensions, including the possibility of further escalation or de-escalation. The reports suggest that these attacks are part of a pattern of violence that complicates diplomatic relations, with each side potentially blaming the other while conducting investigations.

The ongoing live coverage highlights anxieties over regional stability and underscores the importance of transparency and thorough investigation to understand the motives and perpetrators behind these attacks.

Iran ‘not in hurry’ to resume nuclear talks with US

Iran is not rushing to resume nuclear negotiations with the United States despite economic hardships and external pressures, emphasizing a deliberate and patient approach.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi stated Iran remains open to indirect talks with the US if the US engages on equal terms based on mutual interests, but refused to accept US conditions that demand direct negotiations, zero uranium enrichment, and limits on missile stocks and regional support, considering them unreasonable and unfair.

Araghchi highlighted regional shifts, suggesting the region is increasingly perceiving Israel, not Iran, as the primary security threat, and noted that regional dynamics are changing against Israel, the US’s key ally in the Middle East.

The Iranian government dismisses recent US US policies and sanctions, citing the reimposition of UN sanctions and other restrictions, as challenges but emphasizing that Iran’s strategic stance is to wait for more favorable conditions before engaging in negotiations.

Despite the lack of progress in talks, Iran holds that most of its enriched uranium (about 400kg of 60% enriched uranium) remains buried in damaged facilities after being bombed by Israel and the US; Iran does not intend to recover or remove this uranium until circumstances are suitable.

China and Russia have formally expressed non-recognition of the recent EU-led UN sanctions against Iran, which were reimposed following the 2015 nuclear deal, signaling their opposition to external pressure.

European nations such as France, the UK, and Germany have shown willingness to restart negotiations but have yet to make significant progress; they continue to impose sanctions, particularly in relation to alleged drone exports and nuclear activities.

Some European airlines are gradually resuming flights to Iran, with Lufthansa and Austrian Airlines scheduled to restore routes, although no official restart dates have been announced.

Oman’s foreign minister publicly criticized Israel, emphasizing that Israel, not Iran, is the main regional threat, and called for a change in the Gulf Cooperation Council’s approach to Iran, indicating regional shifts in perceived threats and diplomatic attitudes.

Oman has historically served as a mediator between Iran and the US on multiple regional and nuclear issues, despite recent tensions and conflicts, including a 12-day war triggered by Israeli attacks on Iran’s nuclear sites following reports of US messages sent through Oman to Iran.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry confirmed that US messages have been received via Oman, but declined to specify their content or Iran’s response; the White House has not publicly acknowledged sending any messages.

Iran claims that most of its enriched uranium stockpile remains buried under damaged facilities, and is unwilling to retrieve or process it until conditions are more favorable.

Iran’s foreign minister noted that major global powers like China and Russia do not recognize the recent UN sanctions, contrasting with European nations that aim to resume dialogue but face obstacles; meanwhile, sanctions and restrictions persist, affecting Iran’s aviation sector and its regional and nuclear projects.

Sudan slams RSF ‘war crimes’ in el-Fasher as survivors recount killings

A senior Sudanese diplomat accused the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) of committing war crimes, including mass killings and sexual assaults, in North Darfur's el-Fasher, following the city's recent capture by RSF after an 18-month siege that resulted in thousands of civilian deaths.

The Sudanese ambassador to Egypt, Imadeldin Mustafa Adawi, alleged that the UAE supports the RSF, though the Gulf state denies these claims. He called for the classification of the RSF as a terrorist organization and condemned its role in atrocities akin to genocide.

Sudan’s Prime Minister, Kamil Idris, advocated for bringing RSF members to international courts and opposed foreign military intervention, emphasizing the country’s sovereignty amidst ongoing civil war between RSF and the Sudanese army since April 2023.

The capture of el-Fasher marked a significant escalation, with survivors reporting extensive atrocities such as mass executions, pillaging, and sexual violence; official Sudanese figures estimate at least 2,000 deaths, but eyewitness reports suggest the toll is higher, with tens of thousands still trapped in the city.

The Sudanese government is urging the international community to intervene urgently and effectively rather than merely condemn actions, asking for the designation of RSF as a terrorist group and for the UAE to be held accountable as a regional supporter.

Sudan has refused to participate in peace talks involving Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the U.S., and the UAE as long as the UAE remains involved, citing distrust and the need for credible mediators, despite UAE’s denial of arming the RSF.

Other regional and international actors, including Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the U.S., have condemned the violence and called for humanitarian aid, acknowledging collective mistakes in the country's political history that contributed to the current crisis.

Humanitarian agencies report a severe humanitarian crisis, with many residents fleeing el-Fasher experiencing extreme suffering, violence, and displacement; survivors recount fleeing under fire, witnessing dead bodies, and enduring sexual violence, with many unaccounted for due to ongoing insecurity and information blackout.

Aid groups highlight a stark lack of accessible information from el-Fasher after the RSF takeover, with estimates that up to 15,000 people remain stranded in inaccessible areas, emphasizing the urgent need for humanitarian intervention and safe evacuation.

The recent events underscore the ongoing violence and deepening crisis in Sudan, with the latest massacre in el-Fasher exemplifying that the conflict shows little sign of resolution, continuing to cause widespread suffering and chaos.

Agreement eludes neighbours despite three days of talks

The third day of peace talks between Pakistan and Afghanistan in Istanbul was marked by fluctuating optimism and frustration, as both sides attempted to develop a mechanism to curb cross-border terrorism.

Despite most points being mutually agreed upon, the core issue remaining unresolved was establishing a verifiable action plan against terrorist groups operating from Afghan territory, especially addressing the Taliban’s support for the TTP.

Early in the negotiations, there was a hopeful tone with reports of constructive engagement, but as the day progressed, optimism diminished due to Afghan Taliban resistance, particularly their reluctance to formalize guarantees or commit in writing to end support for terrorist groups.

Pakistani officials expressed frustration over Kabul's reluctance, emphasizing the Taliban’s need to end patronage of the TTP and prevent terrorism from Afghan territory, despite external influences like India and Pakistan attempting to mediate sincerely.

The Afghan delegation remained optimistic, stating that remaining disagreements were few and resolvable, and stressed that tensions benefit no one, aiming for a positive outcome from the talks.

Mediation by Turkish and Qatari officials was seen as significant, as both sides continued engagement for a third day, indicating neither wanted to let the process collapse despite no formal agreement being reached.

The discussions highlighted the persistent stalemate, but the fact that both parties sustained engagement was viewed as a positive sign, with some considering an extension into a fourth day.

Overall, the negotiations underscored the complexity of reaching an agreement on terrorism and security cooperation, with close international monitoring and diplomatic efforts ongoing to prevent the talks from unraveling altogether.

FIR registered against 9 NCCIA officials for ‘misuse of authority’ on complaint of YouTuber Ducky Bhai’s wife

A case has been filed with the FIA Anti-Corruption Circle in Lahore against nine NCCIA officers for misuse of authority and accepting bribes, including six officers who were missing for days until their arrest was announced.

The FIR, based on a complaint from Aroob Jatoi, wife of YouTuber Saadur Rehman (Ducky Bhai), relates to his case involving the promotion of online gambling apps.

The nine officers nominated include senior officials from Lahore and Islamabad NCCIA offices, such as Additional Director Sarfraz, Deputy Directors Zawar Ahmad and Muhammad Usman, Assistant Directors Shoaib Riaz, Mujtaba Zafar, and others.

The FIR accuses these officers of extorting Rs9 million from Rehman’s family, using misused authority and collusion with his lawyer, to facilitate his detention and judicial remand during an investigation.

Specific allegations involve extorting Rs6 million on pretext of providing relief, Rs3 million via cheques, and transferring large sums from Rehman’s account to personal accounts through Binance.

The officers are accused of operating as a network, taking monthly bribes to facilitate online fraud activities, and passing amounts through higher officials, with evidence of systematic abuse of power.

The FIR states that the officers misled Rehman’s family about providing him relief and engaged in criminal misconduct, including colluding with call centers and online fraud facilitators.

Significant controversy includes the recent arrest of the six officers presented before a Lahore court, with FIA seeking their physical remand for interrogation.

Their lawyers challenged the legality of their detention, citing violations of their rights under the Constitution and police procedures, and fear that suspects are being illegally confined and denied access to legal counsel and family members.

Reports indicate that Additional Director Sarfraz was removed from his position amid controversies involving media influencers and social media fraudsters, alongside issues involving legal and police disputes.

The disappearance of key officers, including Muhammad Usman, and their subsequent recovery in FIA custody highlight ongoing investigative and institutional challenges.

The Islamabad High Court has granted an extended week to locate the missing Deputy Director Muhammad Usman, amid allegations of abduction, and similar concerns are raised about his wife’s disappearance.

Overall, the case exposes systemic corruption within the NCCIA, misuse of authority, and the vulnerability of officers' legal rights during investigations, with broader implications for accountability and institutional integrity.

What’s next for released Palestinian prisoners?

Thousands of Palestinian prisoners, most detained without charge, have been released from Israeli jails as part of a ceasefire agreement in Gaza, leading to mixed feelings of joy and sadness among families and communities.

Many released prisoners have faced harsh conditions, mistreatment, and systematic torture, which is documented through reports and testimonies, raising concerns about their treatment and the challenges of reintegration.

Several hundred prisoners were forced into exile by Israel, while others return to heavily damaged Gaza or face the risk of re-arrest in the occupied West Bank, highlighting ongoing restrictions and the complex reality under occupation.

The possibility for former Palestinian prisoners to fully embrace freedom is questioned, considering the persistent state of occupation, ongoing hostilities, and the psychological scars from Israeli detention practices.

Experts such as researchers and representatives from human rights organizations emphasize the systemic nature of Israeli detention, the dehumanizing impact of imprisonment, and the broader political and human rights implications.

The release does not signify an end to the broader Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories, nor does it resolve underlying issues related to Palestinian resistance, Israeli military practices, or the ongoing conflict dynamics.

The article underscores the importance of international attention and advocacy for the rights of Palestinian prisoners, calling for accountability regarding torture and inhumane treatment.

The release pact may serve as a temporary step towards de-escalation, but significant questions remain about future political solutions, the end of occupation, and the prospects for long-term peace and justice for Palestinians.

World Cup 2026 qualifiers: Why FIFA won’t ban Israel despite Gaza genocide

FIFA is allowing Israel to resume its qualification matches for the 2026 World Cup amidst widespread protests and international demands for sanctions over its military actions in Gaza, citing an inability or unwillingness to address geopolitical issues within sporting context.

Critics accuse FIFA and UEFA of double standards, highlighting their quick sanctions against Russia in 2022 and failure to act against Israel despite reports, including UN investigations, that describe Israel’s military operations in Gaza as genocidal, with significant harm to Palestinian lives and infrastructure.

Over two years of conflict have resulted in over 67,000 deaths, including a large number of children, along with destruction of Gaza’s football infrastructure, and the killing of at least 421 Palestinian footballers, illustrating the devastating impact of the war on Palestinian sports and society. Calls for banning Israeli teams from international sport have been made by legal experts, political figures, and sports officials, including Spanish Sports Minister Pilar Alegria and former football stars like Eric Cantona, emphasizing the moral and ethical imperative to act against what is described as atrocities in Gaza. FIFA President Gianni Infantino dismisses protest calls as “geopolitical issues,” maintaining football’s role as a unifying force, yet experts perceive Israel’s continued impunity as reflective of broader political and economic interests influencing international sports governance. The Palestinian Football Association (PFA) has formally accused Israel of violating FIFA statutes through its military actions and settlement-related club participation, requesting sanctions including bans, but FIFA postponed decisive action, allegedly under political pressure, including threats from the US and Israel’s allies. Israel’s historical and political isolation in football has evolved; expelled from the AFC in 1974 due to Arab protests, Israel joined UEFA in 1994, where it now competes in Group I alongside Italy and Norway—nations with internal political divisions and protests against their governments’ positions on the Gaza conflict. Countries like Italy and Norway face internal political unrest and protests, with Italy’s team under threat of losing matches if they withdraw, and Norway pledging to donate proceeds from their game against Israel to Gaza humanitarian efforts, demonstrating the complex intersection of sport, politics, and activism. The potential for protests and boycotts inside and outside stadiums complicates the sporting landscape, but the commercialization of football and diplomatic considerations limit the effectiveness of these protests in driving policy changes at FIFA or UEFA. Historically, political pressures, regional alliances, and diplomatic normalization efforts influence sport decisions; despite unity in Arab and Muslim countries against Israeli policies, broader geopolitical and economic interests, including normalization of relations with Israel by some Arab states, inhibit decisive sanctions or expulsion actions from international football bodies. Overall, experts acknowledge that FIFA’s stance reflects a broader pattern of protecting political and commercial interests, resulting in “total impunity” for Israel and highlighting the challenges of using sport as a platform for political protest amid complex global power dynamics.

Dozens killed as Pakistani army, fighters clash near Afghan border

The Pakistan Taliban claimed responsibility for an attack on a military convoy, which triggered a deadly gunfight near the Afghan border in Pakistan’s northwest.

The confrontation involved Pakistani security forces and armed fighters, including members of banned groups such as the Pakistan Taliban, also referred to as “Khawarij” by the military. During an intelligence operation in Orakzai district, a fierce exchange of gunfire broke out, resulting in the deaths of eleven Pakistani military personnel, including Lieutenant Colonel Junaid Arif and Deputy Major Tayyab Rahat, along with nine other soldiers. Pakistani security officials indicated that the fighters ambushed the convoy with a roadside bomb before engaging in a firefight, with 19 fighters killed during the incident. The conflict underscores the ongoing violence in Pakistan’s northwest, attributed to militant groups seeking to overthrow the government and establish their interpretation of Islamic governance. The Pakistan Taliban has increased attacks on Pakistani security forces in recent months, leveraging neighboring Afghanistan for training and planning, a claim denied by both Pakistan and Afghanistan. Pakistan accuses India of backing and funding these militant groups, a charge both countries deny. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif praised the security forces’ efforts and paid tribute to the soldiers who lost their lives, emphasizing their service amid escalating insurgent violence. The incident reflects broader regional tensions, with cross-border militant activity complicating Pakistan’s security landscape and ongoing efforts to combat extremism.

Is it legal for Trump to put his picture on US Mint dollar coin?

The Trump administration plans to issue a $1 commemorative coin featuring Donald Trump’s image on both sides, marking the US’s 250th anniversary, despite the longstanding norm against featuring living persons, especially sitting presidents, on US currency.

While US currency typically avoids depicting living people, there have been instances where living individuals, including presidents, appeared on US paper currency, such as Lincoln, Treasury Secretary Salmon P. Chase, and General Winfield Scott, often through legal loopholes or special circumstances. Historically, legislation has prohibited portraying living persons on US coinage; for example, a 2007 law banning images of current or recent presidents on coins during certain periods, though this law specifically applied to a presidential series and not broadly to all coins. The legal framework for the proposed Trump coin comes from the Circulating Collectible Coin Redesign Act of 2020, signed by Trump in January 2021, which authorizes redesigns for various coins for the US’s 250th anniversary in 2026. This law explicitly prohibits images of living persons solely on the reverse (back) of coins within the series, but it does not explicitly ban portraits on the obverse (front) of the coin, potentially allowing Trump’s image on the front. From a legal standpoint, there appear to be no insurmountable obstacles preventing the creation of a Trump coin, especially if Congress does not intervene; presidential authority could potentially be exercised to produce such a coin. Experts suggest that challenging the coin’s legality might be difficult, as it’s unclear who would have standing to sue, and courts might see no direct harm resulting from its production. The longstanding tradition and norm in the US is not to feature living persons on coins, rooted in the country's republican values and historical practices, as the US sought to differentiate its currency from monarchies where reigning monarchs are depicted on coins. Despite this norm, previous examples exist where living individuals have appeared on US currency, such as a 1921 coin honoring Alabama’s first governor, a 1926 coin featuring Washington and Coolidge, a 1995 coin for the Special Olympics founder Eunice Kennedy Shriver, and a 2016 coin for Ronald and Nancy Reagan. There is also a recent example from Liberia, which in 2025 produced a coin depicting Trump as a Roman emperor, but such instances are rare and often limited to commemorative or special purpose coins. Overall, while there is some historical precedence and legal latitude for a Trump coin, such a move would break with long-standing tradition and could provoke political or public debate, but legally, it appears feasible under current legislation unless Congress explicitly blocks it.

LIVE: Israel kills 8 people in Gaza in 24 hours as talks under way in Egypt

Israel has carried out attacks killing eight Palestinians and injuring 61 others in Gaza within the past 24 hours, with total Palestinian casualties since October 7, 2023, reaching over 67,000 dead and nearly 170,000 injured.

Israeli forces also recovered two bodies from previous strikes, amidst ongoing intense military operations in Gaza. A new documentary, "Inside Gaza," features AFP journalists who were trapped during the initial Israeli attacks, highlighting their documentation of the suffering amid restricted access and discrediting efforts by Israel, with the journalists now residing in Qatar, Egypt, and the UK experiencing post-traumatic stress disorder.

The Gaza Strip faces critical humanitarian conditions with only 14 of its 36 hospitals partially operational, primarily due to shortages of electricity, water, medicine, and damaged infrastructure, forcing hospitals to endure repeated attacks and repairs.

The WHO reports that seven in ten pregnant and breastfeeding women in Gaza suffer from malnutrition, and a significant proportion of newborns are underweight or premature, pointing to worsening health crises. Humanitarian aid is severely impeded by Israeli restrictions, including the denial of access to northern Gaza to retrieve a neonatal incubator and repeated interception of aid vessels attempting to break the Gaza blockade, enhancing the humanitarian crisis. Tensions escalate as Israeli far-right Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir provocatively entered the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, claiming ownership and provoking further unrest, which Palestinians and international observers condemn as a deliberate provocation. Several aid seekers near a food distribution center in southern Gaza were shot at by Israeli forces, causing injuries and deaths, further complicating efforts to deliver humanitarian supplies amid ongoing conflict. Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is engaged in discussions with Hamas and advocates for Palestinian governance, emphasizing the need for a peaceful resolution and a ceasefire, especially following a request from US President Donald Trump. The Palestinian Islamic Jihad condemns Israel's interception of aid flotillas and wider violations of international law during the blockade of Gaza, criticizing the silence of European governments which they say encourages Israeli military actions. Additional conflicts include clashes near the Afghan border involving Pakistan's military, and international criticism of various figures' remarks on Gaza, highlighting the global and regional geopolitical tensions surrounding the conflict.

Pakistan’s mediation brings Gaza ceasefire closer, says PM Shehbaz

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif announced that a ceasefire in Gaza is closer than ever since the conflict began, reaffirming Pakistan’s unwavering support for the Palestinian people.

The statement followed Hamas’s acceptance of key parts of US President Donald Trump’s peace plan, including ending hostilities, Israel’s withdrawal, and the release of hostages and captives. Israel is preparing for the immediate implementation of the first phase of Trump’s Gaza plan, aiming to secure the release of Israeli hostages, and has instructed the military to reduce offensive activities in Gaza. Shehbaz highlighted the development as a significant step towards peace, expressing gratitude towards Trump and Arab countries like Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Turkey, Jordan, Egypt, and Indonesia for their diplomatic efforts. He emphasized Pakistan’s ongoing diplomatic and moral support to Palestinians and committed to working with international partners for a lasting peace in Palestine. Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar welcomed Hamas’s response and insisted that it must now lead to an immediate ceasefire, the end of Palestinian suffering, hostage releases, and unrestricted humanitarian aid. Dar reaffirmed Pakistan’s support for establishing a sovereign Palestinian state based on pre-1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital. Dar engaged in diplomatic talks with Egypt and Saudi Arabia, discussing the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and joint efforts for a ceasefire, emphasizing regional cooperation for peace and aid delivery.

In conversations with Egyptian Foreign Minister Dr Badr Abdelatty and Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud, Dar underlined the importance of a durable ceasefire, humanitarian access, and long-term peace efforts based on a two-state solution. Both Egypt and Saudi Arabia expressed support for ongoing diplomatic initiatives, highlighted the importance of an immediate ceasefire, and reaffirmed commitment to Palestine’s sovereignty, with negotiations focused on achieving a comprehensive peace settlement including East Jerusalem as the Palestinian capital.

Pakistan-Saudi Arabia’s Strategic Mutual Defence Pac

 Pakistan-Saudi Arabia’s Strategic Mutual Defence Pact: What It Means

On 17 September, 2025, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia signed a new and far-reaching Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement (SMDA) in Riyadh. Reuters+2The News International+2 Under this pact, any aggression against one country will be considered an aggression against both. Dawn+2Financial Times+2 The deal was formalised during Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s state visit, at the invitation of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. AP News+2The News International+2

---

What Has Been Agreed

Here are the major points:

• Mutual defense commitment: If one of the two countries is attacked, the other treats it as its own attack. Dawn+2Al Jazeera+2

• Enhanced military cooperation and deterrence: The agreement is not just symbolic — it aims to deepen defence cooperation, strengthen joint deterrence capacities, and develop more concrete mechanisms for security coordination. Al Jazeera+2Financial Times+2

• Continued strategic relations: This is seen as institutionalizing what has been a long-standing security partnership between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, grounded in decades of cooperation. Financial Times+3Dawn+3Al Jazeera+3

• Context matters: The pact comes amid rising regional tensions — particularly following an Israeli airstrike in Qatar — and seems partially motivated by concerns over regional stability and signaling. Financial Times+3Al Jazeera+3AP News+3

---

Why It’s Significant

This agreement marks a shift in several respects:

1. Formal mutual defence assurance
   While Pakistan and Saudi Arabia have long had defence ties — joint exercises, military cooperation, training, etc. — this pact elevates their relationship to a formal commitment that binds both to respond in case of aggression. That is a stronger guarantee. Dawn+1

2. Signal to regional powers & alliances
   The timing and clarity of the agreement send signals to other regional actors. Saudi Arabia seems to be diversifying its security relationships rather than solely relying on traditional external guarantors. Financial Times+2Reuters+2 And it may be a signal to those carrying out or threatening unilateral aggressive actions.

3. Possible implications for nuclear deterrence contexts
   Pakistan is a nuclear-armed state. While the agreement doesn’t explicitly say sharing nuclear deterrence, analysts have flagged the possibility that Pakistan’s nuclear capability could become relevant under this umbrella. AP News+2Al Jazeera+2

4. Strengthening of Pakistan’s diplomatic weight
   Pakistan gains a more formal security partner in Saudi Arabia under this pact. Given Pakistan’s strategic position in South Asia, and its historic ties with both Gulf States and Islamic countries more broadly, this could bolster its international standing.

5. Impacts on regional security balance
   Such a pact might alter the perceived balance of alliances in the Middle East and South Asia. It adds complexity to the security calculus of neighboring countries, particularly those with adversarial or competitive stances vis-à-vis Pakistan or Saudi Arabia.

---

Challenges, Questions, and Risks

Of course, there are a number of potential challenges and concerns:

• Ambiguities in implementation: What exactly constitutes "aggression"? What thresholds, what process? Will both countries automatically activate joint defence? Are there exit clauses? These will matter greatly.

• Risk of entanglement: Given ongoing conflicts, regional disputes, and global pressure points, Pakistan may be pulled into crises in the Gulf or wider Middle East. Similarly, Saudi Arabia’s security challenges could require responding in contexts Pakistan may find difficult.

• Reactions from other regional powers: India, Iran, Israel, and others may view this as a development complicating their strategic calculations. For example, India has reportedly noted the agreement, with concerns about its implications. The Times of India

• Dependence on political stability and continuity: Such agreements depend heavily on consistent political will. Changes in leadership, shifts in domestic priorities, or economic pressures (especially in Pakistan) could affect how deeply the agreement is operationalized.

• Public perception and costs: Defence cooperation, joint exercises, possibly shared infrastructure, intelligence, etc., all cost money and require political legitimacy. Both countries will need to manage domestic opinion and budget constraints.

---

Broader Geopolitical Implications

Some wider implications to keep an eye on:

• U.S. influence & Gulf realignment: The agreement may reflect a sense in Riyadh of wanting more autonomy in their security arrangements, perhaps due in part to perceived unpredictability of traditional security partners.

• Islamic world dynamics: As both Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are prominent in the Muslim world, this pact could reshape how Islamic states think about mutual security, collective defence, and solidarity.

• Effect on the Israel-Palestine / Gaza / Qatar situation: The recent Israeli strike on Qatar is one of the immediate context factors. The pact may serve as both a deterrent and a political message in such discourses.

• Nuclear doctrine: While not officially stated, any hint of nuclear umbrella being extended (or being perceived to be) will attract very close international scrutiny, especially from non-proliferation regimes and rival states.

---

What to Watch Going Forward

Here are some indicators and developments that will show how real this agreement becomes:

• Joint military exercises announced under this agreement.

• Defence infrastructure cooperation; shared bases or joint capacity building.

• How Pakistan and Saudi Arabia respond if one of them is ever involved in a conflict or feels threatened — whether the pact is invoked.

• Diplomatic reactions from India, Iran, the U.S., China, and others—public statements, adjustments in strategy.

• Whether this leads to changes in procurement, defence spending, or alliances.

• Whether regional security institutions or agreements adapt in response (e.g. Gulf Cooperation Council, OIC).

---

Summary

The Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia is a landmark development in the region’s security architecture. It transforms long-standing friendship and cooperation into a binding commitment, one that has potential to reshape both bilateral relations and wider regional alignments. While it offers Pakistan and Saudi Arabia greater security guarantees and deterrence capacity, it also introduces new responsibilities, risks of entanglement, and challenges in execution.

For both governments, the value of this pact will be measured not just in symbolic strength but in how well it is translated into concrete, sustainable actions. For observers, it offers a new chapter in understanding shifting power dynamics in South Asia and the Middle East.

Gaza’s Hunger Crisis: A Humanitarian Catastrophe Unfolding

Gaza’s Hunger Crisis: A Humanitarian Catastrophe Unfolding

Scale and Severity

• Acute Food Insecurity: Nearly every person in Gaza is facing urgent food insecurity. An IPC (Integrated Food Security Phase Classification) snapshot reports that between 93% to nearly 100% of the population falls into IPC Phase 3 (Crisis) or higher, with hundreds of thousands suffering in Emergency (Phase 4) or Catastrophe (Phase 5) conditions.United Nations+1

• Famine Declared: In a rare and grave step, famine has been officially confirmed in Gaza for the first time. More than half a million people are trapped in starvation, with this dire situation projected to spread to central and southern regions.United NationsAl Jazeera

• Escalating Death Toll: As of early September 2025, Gaza’s health ministry reports at least 348 hunger-related deaths in a single day, with overall famine-related fatalities reaching over 317—among them, many children.ReutersIndiatimes

Human Impact

• Children and Mothers at Risk: Around 71,000 children under five face acute malnutrition, and among them, over 43,000 are at a severe risk of death. Pregnant and breastfeeding women are hardly spared, with over 55,000 projected to suffer severe malnutrition.United Nations

• Widespread Starvation: WFP data shows that more than 33% of the population goes an entire day without food, while child malnutrition in Gaza City has quadrupled between May and July.YouTubeHumanium

Systemic Causes

• Ongoing Blockade and Warfare: Since early 2025, Israel's total blockade has halted virtually all aid and commercial supplies, causing food prices to skyrocket (up to 1,400%) and leading bakeries to run out of flour and oil.WikipediaUnited Nations

• Collapse of Local Food Systems: Over 80% of cropland, wells, and agricultural infrastructure have been destroyed or rendered unusable. Livestock, once another lifeline, has drastically declined—sheep down to 36%, cattle to 3.8%, and poultry to 1.4%.United NationsGlobal Climate Review

• Displacement and Systemic Breakdown: Nearly the entire population has been displaced multiple times, with overcrowded shelters lacking access to water, basic sanitation, healthcare, or cooking fuel—creating breeding grounds for deadly diseases.United NationsOCHA OPTWikipedia

Global Response & Moral Outcry

• Calls from UN & Aid Agencies: UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres declared the famine a “man-made disaster,” urging Israel, as occupying power, to uphold its legal duty to ensure food access.Al JazeeraUnited Nations

• Alarm from Aid Agencies: FAO, UNICEF, WFP, WHO, OCHA, and other UN bodies have released urgent appeals for an immediate ceasefire and full humanitarian access to save lives.United Nations+2United Nations+2

• Political Pressure and Support: The UK condemned the aid restrictions as leading to a man-made famine, pledged £15 million in medical support, and is evacuating critically ill children for treatment abroad.AP News

• Shrill Artistic Protest: British musician Billy Bragg released a protest song, “Hundred Year Hunger”, invoking generational suffering and reinforcing global solidarity with Gaza.Pitchfork

A Warning from the Ground

Local and international aid workers describe the population as “walking corpses”—alive, but on the brink of collapse. Hospitals, kitchens, and staff are overwhelmed; many aid kitchens have shuttered, with meal distributions plunging from 840,000 to merely 260,000 in just five days.United NationsAction Against HungerOCHA OPT

---

Summary: A Call for Immediate Action

The hunger crisis in Gaza is not a force of nature—it is a predictable and preventable calamity driven by conflict, blockade, and deliberate power politics. Children are dying. Nearly the entire population is perilously perched on the edge of starvation.

Immediate measures are urgently needed:

• Ceasefire to halt further worsening of conditions.

• Unconditional humanitarian corridors to deliver food, water, medical supplies, and fuel.

• Restoration of agricultural systems, healthcare services, and local livelihoods.